The @washingtonpost gauges Arab public opinion using voodoo reporting. As the Post imagines them, the Arabs have no debate or division between different views (like here in the US, older folks with Israel, younger people with Hamas). The imagined "Arab Street" is one monolithic bloc that is in consensus over the "Palestine cause." Did the Post ask itself what would happen to Arab dissenting voices who think that the "Palestine cause" is a lie behind which all corruption and terrorism hides? Did the Post ever seek out dissenting voices to try to see why they can't say their opinions out loud?
Garbage samples:
"The prevailing view throughout the Middle East is that while Israel is doing the fighting, this is an American war."
And this: "In Arab nations, where solidarity with the Palestinian cause has endured for decades."
https://t.co/5Wh8XkMwZi